2 Proof
Hence \(P_n(x)\) is integer polynomial.
For \( 0 {\lt} x, z {\lt} 1\),,
By definition.
For all \( 0 {\lt} x, z {\lt} 1\), one has
By induction and integration by parts.
For all \(n \in \mathbb {R}, n {\gt} -1\),
For all \(k,s,r \in \mathbb {N}\),
For all \(r,s \in \mathbb {N}\),
Obvious.
for all integers \(r {\gt} 0\)
By Simplification.
Let \(r\) and \(s\) be non-negative integers, with \(r \neq s\), then
By Simplification.
For all \(r \in \mathbb {N}^*, d_n\) is lcm of \(\{ 1, 2, \ldots , n\} .\)
By prime factor expand.
For all \(r \in \mathbb {N}^*\),
for some \(z_r \in \mathbb {Z}\).
By computing.
For all \(r \in \mathbb {N}^*, d_n\) is lcm of \(\{ 1, 2, \ldots , n\} .\)
By prime factor expand.
For all \(r \in \mathbb {N}, r \neq s\),
for some \(z_{rs} \in \mathbb {Z}\).
By computing.
Substitute \(y = (1 - x)z\) in the integral, and we also have \(dy = (1-x)dz\). Then we deduce that
For some integers \(a_n\) and \(b_n\),
Since \(P_n(x) \in \mathbb {Z}[x]\). Suppose \(P_n(x) = \sum \limits _{k=0}^{n}a_kx^k\), where \(a_k \in \mathbb {Z}\).
Then
We have \(J_{rr}\) and \(J_{rs} \in \mathbb {Z}\zeta (3) + \frac{\mathbb {Z}}{d_n^3}\).
So \(JJ_n \in \mathbb {Z}\zeta (3) + \frac{\mathbb {Z}}{d_n^3}\).
Let \(D = \{ (x,y,z)|x,y,z\in (0,1)\} \), then
We have an inequality
Then we can deduce that for \((x,y,z) \in D\),
For \(z\in (0,1)\), the max value of \(\sqrt{z}\sqrt{1-z} = \sqrt{z(1-z)}\) is got at \(z=\frac{1}{2}\). And for \(y \in (0,1)\), we have \(y(1-y)^2 - \frac{4}{27} = (y - \frac{4}{3})(y - \frac{1}{3})^2 \leqslant 0\). Then
Then we have
For \(0 {\lt} z {\lt} 1\),
For \(0 {\lt} x, y {\lt} 1\),
For \(0 {\lt} z {\lt} 1\),
Every point is positive.
For \(r, s \in \mathbb {N}\), one has
One has
as \(x \to \infty \).
We need a precise description of auxiliary constants involved in \(o(1)\) and “sufficiently large” for the purpose of formalisation, we write down the proof in an excruciatingly detailed manner so that each step could be transcribed to Lean4 with relative ease.
We want to show that \(\frac{\pi \left(x\right)}{{ \int _{2}^{x}\frac{\mathsf{d}t}{\log t}}}-1\) is \(o\left(1\right)\), that is for every \(\epsilon \), there exists \(M_{\epsilon }\in \mathbb {R}\) such that \(\left|\frac{\pi \left(x\right)}{{ \int _{2}^{x}\frac{\mathsf{d}t}{\log t}}}-1\right|\le \epsilon \). We know that for all \(2\le x\),
We also know that for all \(0{\lt}\epsilon \), there exists a function \(f_{\epsilon }:\mathbb {R}\to \mathbb {R}\) such that \(f_{\epsilon }=o\left(\epsilon \right)\) and \(f\) is integrable on \(\left(2,x\right)\) for all \(2\le x\) and for \(x\) sufficiently large, say \(x{\gt}N_{\epsilon }\ge 2\)
Hence for all \(0{\lt}\epsilon \), such an \(f\) satisfies: for \(x\) sufficiently large
which simplifies to
Integration by parts tells us that
Hence
for some constant \(C_{\epsilon }\in \mathbb {R}\).
Remember that \(f_{\epsilon }=o\left(\epsilon \right)\), so we know for all \(0{\lt}c\), there exists \(M_{c,\epsilon }\) such that for all \(M_{c,\epsilon }{\lt}x\),\(\left|f_{\epsilon }\left(x\right)\right|\le c\epsilon \). Then for \(2{\lt}M_{c,\epsilon }{\lt}x\), we have
hence for \(M_{c,\epsilon }{\lt}x\), we have
Denote \(D_{c,\epsilon }\) to be \(\int _{N_{\epsilon }}^{M_{c,\epsilon }}\frac{\left|f_{\epsilon }\left(t\right)\right|}{\log ^{2}t}\mathsf{d}t+c\epsilon \frac{M_{c,\epsilon }}{\log M_{c,\epsilon }}-c\epsilon \int _{M_{c,\epsilon }}^{2}\frac{\mathsf{d}t}{\log t}\), we notice
In particular, there exists a constant \(D\) such that for all \(\max \left(M_{\frac{1}{2},\epsilon },N_{\epsilon }\right){\lt}x\),
We now bound \(\int _2^x\frac{\mathsf{d}t}{\log t}\). Note that \(\int _{2}^{x}\frac{\mathsf{d}t}{\log t}\ge \frac{\left(x-2\right)}{\log x}\). Hence for \(x{\gt}e^{s}\) with \(s{\gt}1\), \(\int _{2}^{x}\frac{\mathsf{d}t}{\log t}\ge \frac{e^{s}-2}{s}\) , consequently \(\frac{D}{\int _{2}^{x}\frac{\mathsf{d}t}{\log t}}\le \frac{sD}{e^{s}-2}\le \frac{sD}{e^{s}}\le \frac{\epsilon }{2}\) for \(s\) sufficiently large, say \(s{\gt}A_{\epsilon }{\gt}1\). Thus for all \(x{\gt}\max \left(M_{\frac{1}{2},\epsilon },N_{\epsilon },e^{A_{\epsilon }}\right)\), \(\left|\frac{\pi \left(x\right)}{\int _{2}^{x}\frac{\mathsf{d}t}{\log t}}-1\right|\le \epsilon \). This proves \(\frac{\pi \left(x\right)}{\int _{2}^{x}\frac{\mathsf{d}t}{\log t}}-1\) is \(o\left(1\right)\) for sufficiently large \(x\).
One has
as \(x \rightarrow \infty \).
Let \(n\) be a positive integer. Define \(\pi (n)\) as the number of primes less than (or equal to) \(n\). Then, \(d_n \leqslant n^{\pi (n)} \sim e^n\).
use Prime Number Theorem.
\(\zeta (3)\) is irrational.
Then
which means that
Since \(d_n \leqslant n^{\pi (n)} \sim e^n\) and \(e^3 {\lt} 21\), we have
where\(c_n = d_n^3 b_n\) is integer.
Assume \(\zeta (3) = \frac{p}{q}, (p,q)=1\) and \(p,q{\gt}0\). Then
So \(n \rightarrow \infty , |qa_n + pc_n| \rightarrow 0\).
Since \(|qa_n + pc_n|\) is a integer, so \(|qa_n + pc_n| \geqslant 1\). Contradiction!
So \(\zeta (3)\) is irrational!